Birds of Prey


Many good pigeons have fallen victim to one kind of hawk or another which is a frustrating state of affairs for pigeon fanciers as birds of prey are generally protected. There has been a population explosion of them especially in Germany with its large forested areas and complete protection. What is a fancier to do? Many have given up on this hobby altogether while others let out their birds for exercise only during a few short summer months. How could the situation ever get this bad? Does nature not provide a control of the Goshawk's seemingly unlimited increase in population?
It appears that man is responsible for this imbalance at least in Germany as it was man who exterminated the Uhu (the largest eagle owl) there, the natural enemy of hawks in general. While it is true that this bird would also eat pigeons, given a chance, it hunts at night and is therefore less of a concern for pigeon fanciers than the Goshawk.
It was in 1987 when this Eagle owl was reintroduced into Schleswig-Holstein. As the number of breeding pairs of this owl increased, the number of Goshawk breeding pairs declined until a steady state was established in 2001.
The nesting of Goshawks was severely impinged upon by the nesting of Uhus who took over the territory formerly occupied by Goshawks.
The summary on the left shows clearly the inverse relationship between the number of owl breeding pairs and of the hawk breeding pairs.
(Modified from Busche et al. 2004)
There is an understandable knee jerk reaction after one loses one of one's pigeons, especially if this pigeon showed promise, but I think that it is wiser to temper this anger and try to work with rather than against nature. Remember that it was the extermination of the Eagle owl which caused us racing pigeon fanciers so much grief and I have no doubt that the extermination of another bird of prey, such as the Goshawk, would be just as short sighted.
Original Article at "Die Brieftaube 121 (2004) Nr. 16 | 597"
Some of you, especially those living in areas without a population of Uhus, may look at the above as just a theoretical exercise. However, there is a practical side to it. Fanciers who already considered giving up this beautiful hobby of flying pigeons decided to play a tape with the sounds of this Uhu during periods when they let out their birds for exercise. This resulted in no more losses of pigeons to hawk attacks. If this system would also work in areas where the Uhu is not normally encountered remains to be seen but it would be worth an experiment.
An .mp3 file (730 Kb) or a much longer .wma file (12.2 Mb) can be downloaded (File > Save As...) from here:
Any of these files can be burned onto a CD repeatedly, giving you an hour of protection. Some fanciers are enthusiastic about the results, one of them claiming that even magpies are not around his loft at exercise time any longer. The 24 minute file includes many varieties of different sounds made by the eagle owl.
Here is what my friend Roly, the source of the 24 minute file, wrote: "..it works too, just 30 minutes before letting the birds out is a good idea."
The following is from an article published in "Nature" (April 21, 2005)
How a white feather can outfox a falcon
Tim Radford, science editor 
Thursday April 21, 2005.

When aerial menace zooms in from behind, the feral pigeon does what a dove's got to do - it shows the white feather and stands a better chance of getting clean away, US scientists say.
Albert Palleroni of Harvard University and three colleagues report in Nature today that they set out to solve the puzzle of the white patch often found on the rump of the feral pigeon Columbia livia.

In seven years the researchers recorded 1,485 attacks by five adult peregrine falcons on flocks of feral pigeons flying around Davis, California. They also observed 309 attacks by juveniles. They made a note of the plumage of the luckless target.

And they found that whether the peregrines were at the peak of their powers, or still on a learning curve, the result was the same. Only one dead pigeon in 50 had a set of white feathers on its rump.

The scientists reasoned that the white patch might be an evolutionary adaptation that helped its inheritor to live longer and procreate more. Falcons swoop with fearsome speed: the fastest have been clocked at 157 metres a second - around 320mph.

So they tested the idea by capturing 756 white-rumped and blue-grey pigeons and swapping their plumage coloration. They then released the birds again, and monitored the kill rate of three particular peregrines.

Those birds who could no longer show the white feather fell victim to peregrine strike as often as the blue-coloured pigeons, while the newly whitened showed a much increased ability to survive.

No pigeon can out fly a falcon. They escape by aerobatics. The white patch somehow distracts the peregrine.

The peregrine falcon almost disappeared from large areas of its range 40 years ago, but has slowly been making a comeback. As more falcons begin to cull the pigeons in modern cities, the US scientists argue, an increasing proportion of their prey will start to show the white feather.

Some fanciers also reported very good results through painting the underside of the wing and the side of the body normally covered by the wing with red ink. This red flashing is thought to confuse the predator with the result that he pursues other prey in preference. The mechanism with which this is accomplished appears to be similar to the study reported in "Nature".Many fanciers have better results with the firing of warning shots by using blanks.

Escampadissa

This very ancient race of pigeon is supposed to out fly even a peregrine falcon but I speculate that this is exaggerated. Peregrine falcons have been "molted" by Nature over countless millennia and are specialized for the job of hunting on the dive. A pigeon, even an escampadissa, has none of these for diving specialized anatomical structures of a peregrine falcon.
But escampadissa had been used in the past for trapping peregrine falcons and other birds of prey by flying into a special loft with 2 ceilings. The openings of the top ceiling were large enough (15 cm X 15 cm) for the bird of prey to fit through comfortably but the openings of the second ceiling were large enough only for the pigeon to fit through. The bird of prey was therefore trapped between the 2 ceilings.
I am certain that many kinds of pigeons could be used to trap birds of prey using this method. Besides, these escampadissas are small pigeons that should not be released when too windy. They are easily blown away from the loft and have a notoriously poor homing ability.
Below are your comments:
No comments yet

To the top